← All apps

Academics

DistrictForge

The same votes, redrawn, can hand one side twice the seats. DistrictForge shows how winner-take-all districts turn a 55% vote into all 5 seats — or just 2 — depending on who draws the lines, through packing and cracking. Predict the seats, then measure the gerrymander with the efficiency gap argued before the Supreme Court. Non-partisan (Violet vs Orange), all exact, all on your device. Ages 15–18.

▶ Play it now

Built for sittings of about 25 minutes on the screen. That is our design budget, not a measurement.

Icon coming soon
Live Social Studies / civics — explain how winner-take-all single-member districts turn votes into seats, how packing and cracking (gerrymandering) distort representation, and why who draws the lines matters Quantitative reasoning — compute seats won, wasted votes (a winner's surplus + a loser's all), and the efficiency gap; explain that vote share is not seat share Hero color: #4b5fa6
Engagement: Modes pending

Characters who teach

Meet the cast

DistrictForge is for ages 15–18 — no illustrated cast; the 'characters' are the pieces of a districting map, played by two synthetic parties (Violet and Orange, non-partisan by construction). A district is winner-take-all, so a party's share of the seats can be nothing like its share of the votes. Packing concentrates an opponent into a few landslide districts, wasting their surplus votes; cracking spreads them thin so they lose everywhere by a little, wasting all of them. The efficiency gap — one party's wasted votes minus the other's, over all votes — turns 'this map feels unfair' into a number, the metric argued in Gill v. Whitford (above ~7% flags a likely gerrymander). Every value is exact integer arithmetic computed on-device.

T

The district

Winner-take-all — whoever gets the most votes takes the whole seat, so surplus votes for a winner and every vote for a loser elect no one

P

Packing

Drawing an opponent into a few districts they win in a landslide, so their extra votes pile up wasted and win no additional seats

C

Cracking

Splitting an opponent across many districts so they fall just short in each — wasting all their votes while winning nothing

T

The efficiency gap

Wasted votes, counted — one party's wasted votes minus the other's, over all votes; a gap above about 7% was argued in Gill v. Whitford to flag a likely gerrymander

What's distributed-narrative methodology? →

What's inside

🎯

Learning goal

The same votes, redrawn, can hand one side twice the seats. DistrictForge shows how winner-take-all districts turn a 55% vote into all 5 seats — or just 2 — depending on who draws the lines, through packing and cracking. Predict the seats, then measure the gerrymander with the efficiency gap argued before the Supreme Court. Non-partisan (Violet vs Orange), all exact, all on your device. Ages 15–18.

How DistrictForge handles your kid's data

  • ✅ All progress, settings, and AI-generated content stays on the device
  • ✅ No analytics, no tracking, no third-party SDKs
  • ✅ Free — no ads, no in-app purchases
  • ✅ No personal information collected from children — in line with COPPA (updated by the 2026 FTC amendments)
  • ✅ No chat with strangers — play-together rooms use a short code and preset emotes, never typed messages

Full parent privacy guide →

Kids also liked