Teach & case

Help a near-peer reason through authoring their own direction — when you explain it, you understand it best — then read the real values decision it comes from. There's no "right" answer here.

A case · you decide

Kestrel's fork in the road

Kestrel — a 16-year-old weighing two very different directions after high school

The idea in play: self-authoring your direction — weighing real paths against your OWN values.

Kestrel's family assumes they'll take the stable, respected route — a four-year degree toward a steady office career. But Kestrel lights up building things with their hands in shop class, and dreads the idea of a desk. There's no wrong answer here — only what fits.

The stable path is real and good: security, a clear ladder, a family proud of you. It just isn't automatically YOUR path — "sensible" is a value someone can hold, not a verdict on your life.

The hands-on path is real and good too: you can see what you built, you're rarely bored. It also trades away some predictability for that. Neither is "the smart one" — they serve different things a person might care about.

Kestrel has one summer to explore before deciding. Spend it shadowing the office career their family expects, or apprenticing in the trade they're drawn to?

By August Kestrel genuinely loves the trade but worries it looks less impressive than the degree their friends are chasing. Which weighs more?

Weigh your own paths →

A case · you decide

Kestrel and Linnea and the summer choice

Linnea & Kestrel — seventeen, choosing between two summer offers

The idea in play: a decision under uncertainty is easier when you know what you value, and you still have to decide without knowing the outcome.

Linnea has two offers: a paid job at a grocery store, or an unpaid role helping at a wildlife clinic, which is the work she thinks she might want to do. She does not know yet whether she would like it.

Kestrel's move is clarifying values: what matters most to her this summer?

Linnea's move is deciding under uncertainty: choosing well without knowing how it will turn out.

What should Linnea choose?

Try the future-self exercise →

A case · you decide

Casper and Rafferty and the career question

Casper & Rafferty — seventeen, curious about architecture but not sure what architects do all day

The idea in play: talking to someone who does the work and imagining your future self are two ways of testing a direction.

Casper likes drawing buildings. He has never met an architect. His aunt knows one who would chat for 20 minutes.

Casper's move is the informational interview: ask someone about their real work.

Rafferty's move is future orientation: picture yourself doing it in ten years and notice how that feels.

What should Casper do next?

Try the future-self exercise →